We've enjoyed our little blog, All Hail Jennie, but it's time to bring it to an end. We've met so many great people and we can't thank you enough for your support, but we're moving on to other fun projects.
Jennie has brought us such joy over the years. We're thrilled she's embarking on so many wonderful new adventures. Thanks Jennie!
Do you have a favorite singer or subject you love? Start a blog! It's free and fun and you never know where things will take you.
Talk to you all soon.
Much love, Paul & Katrin
Wednesday, July 4, 2012
Tuesday, July 3, 2012
When the hurlyburly’s done…
The play came, the play went.
That was that: an evening spent. (Scott C. Wells)
Macbeth, Grand Théâtre de Genève, June 2012
When I first heard that Jennifer Larmore was going to sing Lady Macbeth I thought: “Madness!” and “This will be her undoing!” So it was with some trepidation that I went to Geneva for the new Christof Loy production of Verdi’s “Macbeth” at the Grand Théâtre. Lady Macbeth is such an iconic role: every actress wants to play her and every dramatic soprano wants to sing the part. Until now I had not placed Jennifer Larmore in the category “dramatic soprano”… but then I had never expected her to sing Countess Geschwitz or Kostelnicka either – and in both parts she triumphed! So maybe she would do the trick again and put to shame all those who scoffed at her audacity in tackling a dramatic Verdi role.
When I approached the opera house on the afternoon of June 24th I was greeted by deafening noises from a bandstand set up right in front of the theatre and a parade of gaudily dressed singers, dancers and acrobats hopping around the Place Neuve in some kind of horrible witches sabbath! Was this part of the production? The witches ballet from act 3? “Round about the cauldron go / In the poison’d entrails throw!” You never know these days…but, no, this vulgar spectacle was definitely not Loy style! My only worry was would this horrible hullaballoo go on during the whole afternoon and how would this affect the performance inside…? Fortunately the theatre was soundproof and no outside noises interfered with Verdi! Where Loy’s “Jenufa” at the Deutsche Oper Berlin had been set in a blindingly white box the new “Macbeth” was set in a very dark, gloomy room of a “Gothick” Scottish castle, with a big Tudor style fireplace on the left and a sweeping central staircase in the background (Design: Jonas Dahlberg; Lighting: Bernd Purkrabek) with associations of old black and white horror films of the 1930s or Victorian mystery thrillers. This stage set was the perfect visual translation of Verdi’s darkest and gloomiest score. Loy again had this production tailor-made for Jennifer Larmore who spooks around the stage, as “The Woman in White” already during the overture. For her entrance aria she descends the grand staircase majestically clad in black velvet, and for the banqueting scene she wears a white crinoline right out of “Gone with the Wind” (costumes: Ursula Renzenbrink) – which made me think what a shame it is that there isn’t an opera based on this novel, as Scarlett O’Hara would have been her role of a lifetime. She certainly looked every inch a queen. As for her singing I would say she gave a historically informed performance of the role, firmly planting it in the belcanto tradition in which Verdi was rooted, ornamenting the reprise of the cabaletta “Or tutti sorgete” and also the brindisi. You rarely hear the trills in the drinking song “Si colmi il calice” so clearly chiselled. Also, her high notes were truly ringing throughout, her big asset these days. The problem with this role is that Verdi wanted to leave the old-style belcanto tradition behind with this opera, demanding a new singing style, more dramatic and declamatory, while at the same time he wrote “old-fashioned” arias, cavatine and cabalette that run contrary to his declarations. Maybe in 1847 he didn’t want to completely alienate audiences, so pacified them with “conventional” numbers alongside truly revolutionary ones like the duet after the murder and the sleepwalking scene, the crucial moments around which the whole piece revolves: “These numbers must absolutely not be sung, they must be acted and declaimed with a very muted and veiled voice.” The duet “Tutto è finito [“I have done the deed!”] – Fatal mia donna” was certainly a highlight of the performance, almost more whispered and hissed frantically and panic-fuelled than sung and so totally in keeping with Verdi’s instructions for it to be sung altogether “sotto voce” and “con sordino”. In the sleepwalking scene Verdi broke free from the conventional, Lucia/Puritani/Sonnambula-style mad scene, renouncing all empty virtuosity and meaningless coloratura cascades in favour of a straightforward singing line that mirrors the never-ending nightmare the Lady is now wrapped up in. The sombre and subdued orchestral colours (the haunting cor anglais!) make this scene one of the most spine-chilling and at the same time deeply moving of all opera, and Jennifer Larmore’s interpretation was truly riveting (never mind the now rather extended vibrato that has crept into her singing). We see the Lady slowly sinking to the ground, weighed down, as it were, by the burden of her conscience, and the feared D flat at the end has to be sung or rather breathed by her while lying flat on her back – not the most comfortable singing position to be sure! What the voice perhaps ultimately lacks to make it a true Verdi voice is a certain texture and clout, the “undaunted mettle” that makes this formidable character truly dominant. In the interval I overheard someone say “She is not Birgit Nilsson!” That’s neither here nor there. You could as well say that a cherry is not a strawberry or a cat not a dog! And I doubt Verdi had someone like Nilsson in mind when he wrote the music – simply because voices like this, I am sure, didn’t exist at the time. They were not needed: Tristan und Isolde, Elektra, Turandot had yet to be written! And you cannot impose a much later singing-style on a work from an earlier period (as has, of course, been done for much of the 20th century, and is still going on, despite the “HIP” movement opening up new perspectives on old and supposedly well-known works).
So Larmore once again acquitted herself valiantly against great odds and showed that you don’t have to be a Wagner or Verismo singer to do justice to early Verdi. She was helped in this by the fluent and transparent orchestra sound of the Orchestre de la Suisse Romande under the baton of Ingo Metzmacher which sounded almost like a period band in that the playing was always well-balanced, crisp and never too loud or rough, not drowning the singers (Verdi wrote for singers not in competition with them!). While doing perfect justice to the dramatic culmination points Metzmacher withstood the impulse of some conductors that seem to feel the need to whip up early Verdi into loud and glaring barrel organ vulgarity; he followed the composer’s instructions carefully, revealing the truly revolutionary things that Verdi did with the orchestra and which belie Wagner’s dictum that in Italian opera the orchestra is merely an “accompanying guitar” [“Begleitgitarre”].
The role of Macbeth was interpreted by Franco Vassallo, standing in at short notice for the indisposed Davide Damiani: a true velvety and chocolaty Verdi baritone of whom I hope to hear more in the future! His rendering of “Pietà, rispetto, amore” was a highlight. Loy had turned this monologue into a kind of lamento for the dying lady who was at this very moment expiring in Macbeth's arms – a strange Pietà-like scene, evoking King Lear and Cordelia! Christian van Horn gave true nobility to Banquo, as well as for his impressive stature as for his authoritative charcoal bass; Andrea Caré’s Macduff sounded clear as a clarion in his popular tenor aria “O figli miei”(the most conventional number in the opera, Verdi’s one major concession to audiences’ expectations). And special commendation must go to the excellent choir which hit the right strident and lurid notes for the witches and gave a truly moving and ultimately rousing rendering of the Scottish refugees’ chorus “Patria oppressa”. To sum up a brilliant performance of a favourite opera that was worth the trip to this very expensive place that is Geneva: My seat in the gods, miles away from the stage, was 95 chf (=77 euros), a price for which I get a front stalls seat in Berlin! Plus you need mountaineering skills and abseiling equipment to tackle the really steep steps of this amphitheatre and must absolutely not suffer from fear of heights! I saw some people really struggling. The Grand Théâtre urgently needs air conditioning, it was insufferably hot and stuffy up there on Mont Blanc, without the cooling ice cap of that mountain massif!
Monday, March 19, 2012
Out of Moravia
Janácek's "Jenufa" at Deutsche Oper Berlin
A room, a clinically white box, so brightly lit that it makes your eyes hurt; empty save for a table and chair. A door opens and a woman in grey carrying a bag is ushered in. The door is closed behind her. The woman looks around as if for orientation, then comes to the front gazing abstractedly. The music then sets in, triggering a train of thoughts and emotions in the woman: one moment she is frowning, the next the trace of a smile crosses her face. It is the Kostelnicka in jail reflecting upon how things went so terribly wrong that she finds herself imprisoned. This is the stark beginning of Christof Loy’s interpretation of Janacek’s “Jenufa”. This claustrophobic stage set will be the same for the following 3 acts, the personages locked in as it were in a kind of terrarium where there is no escape from the strict code of morals of a tightly knit village community in which everyone knows and watches everyone and all are somehow related. The rear wall opens from time to time to show telegraph poles in a withered cornfield in Act I, and the same scenery, snow-covered and desolate, in Act II. In this abstract set the characters of the opera are moving like in a test arrangement, totally exposed to the gaze of the spectators.
Loy’s psychologically precise and subtle direction leaves no room for grand opera gestures and poses, but like in an Indian temple dance every single movement of a hand or even the blink of an eye has its proper meaning in a given context. Nothing in this no-nonsense, no gimmicks approach diverts the attention from a story that unravels inexorably as in a Greek tragedy.
The original title of the opera (as of the play by Gabriela Preissova) is “Her Stepdaughter”, indicating two female leads. Loy makes the Kostelnicka the pivot around which the action revolves. In conventional productions we have her portrayed as a prim moralizer, inevitably clad in black governess dress, terrorizing the whole village with her harangues. Old photographs by contrast show her surprisingly youthful and almost gaudily dressed in a kind of “dirndl”. Some time in the opera’s performance history veteran Wagnerian sopranos on the look-out for a farewell role that still offers ample opportunities for stentorian hectoring with which to cover up age-related loss of vocal focus pounced on this part.So, as a stone gathers dross, the originally quite harmless and respected member of the congregation, village agony-aunt and healer was turned into a veritable stepmother from hell and sister to the witch in “Hansel & Gretel”, feared and loathed by all, including her own terror-stricken step-child Jenufa.
How old is the Kostelnicka? Certainly not as old as the ex-Wagnerians on the threshold to the retirement home! If Grandma Buryjovka is, say, 65-70 years old and Jenufa 20, Steva and Laca in their early twenties, then this would make Kostelnicka a woman of between 45 and 50 years of age, a middle-aged matron but certainly not the customary old harridan!
Let’s get the complicated family relations of the Buryja clan clear: there is Grandma Buryjovka, who had two sons (both deceased); one was the father of Steva, the handsome, easy-going heartthrob. Steva’s mother had a son from a first marriage, Laca, introvert and overlooked, passed over despite being the elder as owner of the Buryja mill that went to Steva. Jenufa is the daughter of Old Buryjovka’s second son by his first wife who died in childbirth. He then married Petrona Slomkova who had been secretly in love with him for some time, and despite warnings from her mother about his bad character was only too happy to become his wife and stepmother to his little daughter. The marriage turned into a nightmare for Petrona, as her husband proved a brutal drunkard who would beat her up regularly and squander all their money until his timely death presumably from alcoholic cirrhosis. This traumatic marriage left Petrona scarred and determined to spare her stepdaughter a similar misfortune. But in real life as on the stage things do not always develop according to plan and sometimes even the most careful vigilance of the mother cannot prevent the daughter from going astray.
The casting of Jennifer Larmore in the role of Kostelnicka is a welcome divergence from the misuse made of this role mentioned above and consistent with Loy’s concept of showing her as an erring human being, not a monster. She may appear severe in the first Act when she imposes a probationary year on Steva in which he must abstain from drink before she will even consider a marriage between him and Jenufa. But she seems to be the only one in the village who appraises Steva’s character (or rather lack thereof) correctly. The Varnay/Mödl/Schlemm/Behrens/Silja fraction may have had their reservations about this role debut but in the event they (or most of them anyway) came away won over by a totally successful and convincing portrayal of a woman struggling to keep up appearances and trying to do the right thing within the prison walls of a rigid code of moral conduct. Larmore with her solid belcanto schooling proved that you can actually sing this part and need not howl the notes like an air-raid siren.
The second Act must surely be the most harrowing opera act ever written, with the possible exception of Act IV of “Otello”! Here the singer of the Kostelnicka must really “deliver”, and Larmore truly surpassed herself in portraying a woman in a terrible, almost unsolvable moral dilemma. As in Shakespearean or Greek tragedy the spectators know that calamity is impending, they long to interfere but are, of course, as powerless as the characters onstage to ward off the inevitable. Not that Preissova is in any way on a par with Shakespeare or Sophocles, but Janácek’s dramatic musical genius lifts maudlin melodrama to tragic heights. Often the antics of many a Kostelnicka in the moments leading up to the murder of the baby and her subsequent bouts of madness have turned the whole character into an unintentional parody. We witness operatic wringing of hands, flailing of arms and hysterical laughter. Nothing of this, thanks to Loy & Larmore, in this production. We see a loving mother-daughter relationship, Jenufa trusting and confident, the Kostelnicka already having misgivings about the irresponsible lover’s constancy When she, after pleading in vain with an evasive Steva to acknowledge his child and do the “decent thing”, takes the terrible decision to murder the baby she appears to crawl behind the door of Jenufa’s room, like one frightened by her own murderous impulses, as if to hide from the horrible deed she is going to commit, or from some powers above she imagines “peep[ing] through the blanket of the dark to cry: ‘hold, hold!’ ”
When she returns she is not the same person but a woman shaken to the very core by the unspeakable she has done. She is frantic with fear, her movements become erratic, and in Act 3 she can only sit crouched on a chair, scared and hollow-eyed, holding on to the bag in which she carried the baby to its icy death. In the end the finding of the baby’s body and her confession come as a relief to her and she walks out upright again, almost jauntily, saying to the dumbfounded mayor en passant: “Now lead me away!” She knows her botched life is over but that her daughter will have a happier future. – Or will she? Jenufa must be deeply traumatized by the fact that she had a baby she loved despite its being “illegitimate” and that was cruelly murdered by the woman she trusted. And now she will become the wife of the man who cut up her face. Laca may have reached the goal of his wishes in marrying the woman he loves, but will suffer lifelong remorse of his one jealous outburst in which he scarred her forever. They are both clad in sober black and walk towards a black horizon, or rather are swallowed up by a black hole, an unsettling picture which counteracts the optimistically surging music, but is consistent with the director’s analytic approach: there can be no simple “happy ending”. An uncertain future awaits the newly-weds, and it will take some time for them to sort out their lives.
Michaela Kaune as Jenufa makes plausible the development from ardently loving girl to grown-up woman who confidently takes her destiny in her own hands at the end, singing with luminous voice throughout, never once faltering in a vocally and physically challenging role. Maybe she is a tad too resigned, too meekly accepting her fate and too easily forgiving, but these are more or less the dictates of the role, and we 21st century audiences have to accept this.
The two half-brothers are also ideally typecast: Joseph Kaiser as Steva, tall and handsome, but also slinking and slouching, shirking responsibility wherever possible, sings with a soft, mellifluous tenor that insinuates itself in every woman’s heart. Will Hartmann as Laca, is shorter and stockier. He doesn’t wear his heart on his sleeve and has difficulties articulating his feelings, so shows the world an indifferent, even morose exterior, his firm voice and ringing high notes betraying his passionate nature that sometimes flares up in violent outbursts. Hanna Schwarz as Old Buryjovka looks an unlikely village grandma when she comes in with a tin bucket and potato bowl wearing high heels and a red wig. Her singing is now of the caterwauling kind, and while I overheard someone, apparently belonging to the Silja fraction, say he would have wanted her to do the Kostelnicka, I for one was grateful that my eardrums and nerves were spared this ordeal.
The smaller roles are all excellently cast from the Deutsche Oper ensemble, with a cameo appearance of Nadine Secunde as the mayor’s wife. She provides a moment of comic relief before the final “showdown”, when she stuffs herself with doughnuts at the wedding breakfast, carping with a full mouth that she would never have her daughter marry in such a miserable way, “ill-clad and without a bridal wreath!” Her and her Karolka’s (Martina Welschenbach, peroxide blonde and fresh and proper as Doris Day) triumph in having captured the coveted Steva as a bridegroom is short-lived, however. When it is revealed that he is the father of Jenufa’s child found dead under the thawing ice of the millstream, they, like everyone else, shrink from him in horror.
Everyone agrees that with this production which has all the ingredients to become a “classic” the Deutsche Oper has been set on the right track again after years of artistic stagnation in a quagmire. And with the new Music Director Donald Runnicles at the helm the orchestra has at last found back to old form. From the first note Janácek’s music exerts its almost hypnotic pull. The mill-wheel’s mechanical rotation, churning the waters as well as the human passions in an eternal cycle, the strange, archaic rapping of the xylophone, hammering away on your nerves, set the mood for the next 2 hours of a relentlessly unfurling drama of crime and punishment.
A room, a clinically white box, so brightly lit that it makes your eyes hurt; empty save for a table and chair. A door opens and a woman in grey carrying a bag is ushered in. The door is closed behind her. The woman looks around as if for orientation, then comes to the front gazing abstractedly. The music then sets in, triggering a train of thoughts and emotions in the woman: one moment she is frowning, the next the trace of a smile crosses her face. It is the Kostelnicka in jail reflecting upon how things went so terribly wrong that she finds herself imprisoned. This is the stark beginning of Christof Loy’s interpretation of Janacek’s “Jenufa”. This claustrophobic stage set will be the same for the following 3 acts, the personages locked in as it were in a kind of terrarium where there is no escape from the strict code of morals of a tightly knit village community in which everyone knows and watches everyone and all are somehow related. The rear wall opens from time to time to show telegraph poles in a withered cornfield in Act I, and the same scenery, snow-covered and desolate, in Act II. In this abstract set the characters of the opera are moving like in a test arrangement, totally exposed to the gaze of the spectators.
Loy’s psychologically precise and subtle direction leaves no room for grand opera gestures and poses, but like in an Indian temple dance every single movement of a hand or even the blink of an eye has its proper meaning in a given context. Nothing in this no-nonsense, no gimmicks approach diverts the attention from a story that unravels inexorably as in a Greek tragedy.
The original title of the opera (as of the play by Gabriela Preissova) is “Her Stepdaughter”, indicating two female leads. Loy makes the Kostelnicka the pivot around which the action revolves. In conventional productions we have her portrayed as a prim moralizer, inevitably clad in black governess dress, terrorizing the whole village with her harangues. Old photographs by contrast show her surprisingly youthful and almost gaudily dressed in a kind of “dirndl”. Some time in the opera’s performance history veteran Wagnerian sopranos on the look-out for a farewell role that still offers ample opportunities for stentorian hectoring with which to cover up age-related loss of vocal focus pounced on this part.So, as a stone gathers dross, the originally quite harmless and respected member of the congregation, village agony-aunt and healer was turned into a veritable stepmother from hell and sister to the witch in “Hansel & Gretel”, feared and loathed by all, including her own terror-stricken step-child Jenufa.
How old is the Kostelnicka? Certainly not as old as the ex-Wagnerians on the threshold to the retirement home! If Grandma Buryjovka is, say, 65-70 years old and Jenufa 20, Steva and Laca in their early twenties, then this would make Kostelnicka a woman of between 45 and 50 years of age, a middle-aged matron but certainly not the customary old harridan!
Let’s get the complicated family relations of the Buryja clan clear: there is Grandma Buryjovka, who had two sons (both deceased); one was the father of Steva, the handsome, easy-going heartthrob. Steva’s mother had a son from a first marriage, Laca, introvert and overlooked, passed over despite being the elder as owner of the Buryja mill that went to Steva. Jenufa is the daughter of Old Buryjovka’s second son by his first wife who died in childbirth. He then married Petrona Slomkova who had been secretly in love with him for some time, and despite warnings from her mother about his bad character was only too happy to become his wife and stepmother to his little daughter. The marriage turned into a nightmare for Petrona, as her husband proved a brutal drunkard who would beat her up regularly and squander all their money until his timely death presumably from alcoholic cirrhosis. This traumatic marriage left Petrona scarred and determined to spare her stepdaughter a similar misfortune. But in real life as on the stage things do not always develop according to plan and sometimes even the most careful vigilance of the mother cannot prevent the daughter from going astray.
The casting of Jennifer Larmore in the role of Kostelnicka is a welcome divergence from the misuse made of this role mentioned above and consistent with Loy’s concept of showing her as an erring human being, not a monster. She may appear severe in the first Act when she imposes a probationary year on Steva in which he must abstain from drink before she will even consider a marriage between him and Jenufa. But she seems to be the only one in the village who appraises Steva’s character (or rather lack thereof) correctly. The Varnay/Mödl/Schlemm/Behrens/Silja fraction may have had their reservations about this role debut but in the event they (or most of them anyway) came away won over by a totally successful and convincing portrayal of a woman struggling to keep up appearances and trying to do the right thing within the prison walls of a rigid code of moral conduct. Larmore with her solid belcanto schooling proved that you can actually sing this part and need not howl the notes like an air-raid siren.
The second Act must surely be the most harrowing opera act ever written, with the possible exception of Act IV of “Otello”! Here the singer of the Kostelnicka must really “deliver”, and Larmore truly surpassed herself in portraying a woman in a terrible, almost unsolvable moral dilemma. As in Shakespearean or Greek tragedy the spectators know that calamity is impending, they long to interfere but are, of course, as powerless as the characters onstage to ward off the inevitable. Not that Preissova is in any way on a par with Shakespeare or Sophocles, but Janácek’s dramatic musical genius lifts maudlin melodrama to tragic heights. Often the antics of many a Kostelnicka in the moments leading up to the murder of the baby and her subsequent bouts of madness have turned the whole character into an unintentional parody. We witness operatic wringing of hands, flailing of arms and hysterical laughter. Nothing of this, thanks to Loy & Larmore, in this production. We see a loving mother-daughter relationship, Jenufa trusting and confident, the Kostelnicka already having misgivings about the irresponsible lover’s constancy When she, after pleading in vain with an evasive Steva to acknowledge his child and do the “decent thing”, takes the terrible decision to murder the baby she appears to crawl behind the door of Jenufa’s room, like one frightened by her own murderous impulses, as if to hide from the horrible deed she is going to commit, or from some powers above she imagines “peep[ing] through the blanket of the dark to cry: ‘hold, hold!’ ”
When she returns she is not the same person but a woman shaken to the very core by the unspeakable she has done. She is frantic with fear, her movements become erratic, and in Act 3 she can only sit crouched on a chair, scared and hollow-eyed, holding on to the bag in which she carried the baby to its icy death. In the end the finding of the baby’s body and her confession come as a relief to her and she walks out upright again, almost jauntily, saying to the dumbfounded mayor en passant: “Now lead me away!” She knows her botched life is over but that her daughter will have a happier future. – Or will she? Jenufa must be deeply traumatized by the fact that she had a baby she loved despite its being “illegitimate” and that was cruelly murdered by the woman she trusted. And now she will become the wife of the man who cut up her face. Laca may have reached the goal of his wishes in marrying the woman he loves, but will suffer lifelong remorse of his one jealous outburst in which he scarred her forever. They are both clad in sober black and walk towards a black horizon, or rather are swallowed up by a black hole, an unsettling picture which counteracts the optimistically surging music, but is consistent with the director’s analytic approach: there can be no simple “happy ending”. An uncertain future awaits the newly-weds, and it will take some time for them to sort out their lives.
Michaela Kaune as Jenufa makes plausible the development from ardently loving girl to grown-up woman who confidently takes her destiny in her own hands at the end, singing with luminous voice throughout, never once faltering in a vocally and physically challenging role. Maybe she is a tad too resigned, too meekly accepting her fate and too easily forgiving, but these are more or less the dictates of the role, and we 21st century audiences have to accept this.
The two half-brothers are also ideally typecast: Joseph Kaiser as Steva, tall and handsome, but also slinking and slouching, shirking responsibility wherever possible, sings with a soft, mellifluous tenor that insinuates itself in every woman’s heart. Will Hartmann as Laca, is shorter and stockier. He doesn’t wear his heart on his sleeve and has difficulties articulating his feelings, so shows the world an indifferent, even morose exterior, his firm voice and ringing high notes betraying his passionate nature that sometimes flares up in violent outbursts. Hanna Schwarz as Old Buryjovka looks an unlikely village grandma when she comes in with a tin bucket and potato bowl wearing high heels and a red wig. Her singing is now of the caterwauling kind, and while I overheard someone, apparently belonging to the Silja fraction, say he would have wanted her to do the Kostelnicka, I for one was grateful that my eardrums and nerves were spared this ordeal.
The smaller roles are all excellently cast from the Deutsche Oper ensemble, with a cameo appearance of Nadine Secunde as the mayor’s wife. She provides a moment of comic relief before the final “showdown”, when she stuffs herself with doughnuts at the wedding breakfast, carping with a full mouth that she would never have her daughter marry in such a miserable way, “ill-clad and without a bridal wreath!” Her and her Karolka’s (Martina Welschenbach, peroxide blonde and fresh and proper as Doris Day) triumph in having captured the coveted Steva as a bridegroom is short-lived, however. When it is revealed that he is the father of Jenufa’s child found dead under the thawing ice of the millstream, they, like everyone else, shrink from him in horror.
Everyone agrees that with this production which has all the ingredients to become a “classic” the Deutsche Oper has been set on the right track again after years of artistic stagnation in a quagmire. And with the new Music Director Donald Runnicles at the helm the orchestra has at last found back to old form. From the first note Janácek’s music exerts its almost hypnotic pull. The mill-wheel’s mechanical rotation, churning the waters as well as the human passions in an eternal cycle, the strange, archaic rapping of the xylophone, hammering away on your nerves, set the mood for the next 2 hours of a relentlessly unfurling drama of crime and punishment.
Friday, April 8, 2011
Interview with the Diva
On the occasion of the run of "Orlando Furioso" at Théâtre des Champs-Elysées the Diva received our foreign correspondent at her beautiful Parisian home and granted the Blog an exclusive interview.
Question:You are celebrating your 25th anniversary on stage this year. In what way have things changed in the opera world since the beginning of your career?
Answer:Its been changing gradually and when that happens one doesn’t notice as much. One thing that has been noticeable however is that while the music itself used to be the most important it is now how young and good looking you are that seems to be of utmost importance. This has happened because agents have decided to put young singers in the position of “Stars” even before they’ve had a chance to prove themselves or pay their “dues”. This isn’t fair to those young people because you can’t just skip the steps it takes to learn your craft, get experience and feel more and more comfortable in your skin onstage. Making money on these singers is the goal and not helping to create a real artist. This will ultimately be detrimental to all involved as the young singer may burn out emotionally, vocally or even come to believe all the hype and never even try to reach their potential and then the career is shortened. Everyone loses in the end.
Q.:In what way , according to you, is opera as an art form still relevant in the 21st century?
A.:Opera will always be relevant because there will always be those people who love it and want it. It speaks to the heart like nothing else can. True, the majority doesn’t understand or even want to, but for the ones who do, it’s eternal.
Q.:You are currently singing Alcina in Vivaldi’s Orlando Furioso in Paris and on tour in several European cities, a role you have sung many times in concert performances and on a memorable recording with J.-C. Spinosi. It occurred to me during the performance that Alcina who manipulates men and toys with them, like Circe who turns Ulysses’ companions into pigs, begins to lose her grip on things the moment she seriously falls in love, i.e. becomes “human”. How do you see the role of the sorceress in this piece?
A.: Alcina is on a journey that ultimately and surprisingly destroys her. She begins the opera seeing Love as a game. But when she falls in love for real, then she becomes its unrequited victim. She isn’t immune to the power of love or human emotion like she thought she was. It really surprises her in the end and she can’t accept her human like failings.
Q.:You have travelled a long way from the Rosinas and Angelinas of your earlier days to “grown up”-roles like Fricka in “Das Rheingold”, Countess Geschwitz in “Lulu” and upcoming Kostelnicka in “Jenufa” as well as Lady Macbeth! How do you make the transition?
A.:I sing whatever I sing with the voice that I have. There has been a vocal evolution through the years to be sure. My voice has taken on different colors and depths as well as personality, and if it isn’t exactly what it was as a young singer, that’s OK. It’s different and in some ways even better! The roles I have chosen to do through the years exemplify my voice as it is at that given moment. These roles also allow me to enjoy a depth of dramatic feeling and acting that maybe I just wasn’t capable of when I was younger. The transition itself has been rather effortless because I don’t pretend to sing any of these new roles as someone else might sing them but only as I am capable of singing them.
Q.:In recent years you seem to have become a favourite of German director Christof Loy’s. How did this “special relationship” come about and how would you describe working with him?
A.:I first met Christof Loy at my Paris apartment to talk over the role of “Geschwitz” in Berg’s LULU for his new production at Covent Garden. I immediately fell in love with his way of thinking, his joy for the project and ultimately his way of working. The feeling was mutual and after a wonderful MERRY WIDOW in Geneva, we are doing “Macbeth” together at Geneva again and Jenufa at the Deutsche Oper Berlin.
Q.:You teach masterclasses. How do you see your role, your responsibilty as teacher? In what way do you think young singers can learn from your experience, your career?
A.:Master classes are a passion of mine because I can see such an instant improvement in the well being and therefore the voice of the singer in just that 30 minute session! I don’t presume to teach technically in that amount of time, but I do believe its possible to zero in on the most important thing that could help that specific singer psychologically to open up their body and voice; I seem to be rather good at it so it’s encouraging for the future! I have 25 years of experience to give weight behind the things I say and I feel it’s a real duty to tell others what I’ve been through. That’s why the Q & A sessions at the end are so important.
Q.:Now for some more unpleasant aspects of the opera world; keywords: favouritism, sexism, ageism … Your experiences with any of these.
A.:Of course there is always a bit of all of this happening in the entertainment world, but to tell you he honest truth, I haven’t had terrible experiences that I can remember. The voice is a special animal! People do have their favorites and its not all just about the sound. It has to do with the total package and so I completely understand if I’m passed over for another Mezzo because I just wasn’t what they were looking for! It’s normal. There also comes a time in everyone’s career where you aren’t the new young thing anymore and there’s a new “flavor of the month”. If you’ve sung for 25 years, no matter how good you are, you are “old news” and you shouldn’t even try to compete with the “New”. Let them have their time and enjoy the time you’re in now!
Q.:What do you love most about your life and career right now?
A.:The changes and excitement that come with learning new, dramatic roles into which I can “sink my teeth”! The chance to work with interesting, insightful people, the fact of living in Europe. My family and friends and loved ones make it all worth it!
Q.:How do you deal with the moments when there is just “too much music to learn?”
A.:I get crazy and then just DO it! The only way to make yourself feel better is to do the work.
Q.:You have recently taken up residence in Paris. Do you have a special affinity to this city, to France?
A.:I began my career in France and it was the first country to open wide its arms and welcome me in as a young, unknown singer. I have always loved France and still do!
Q.:Are singers constantly concerned about their voice? Scarves wrapped around the throat, hats, cough drops?
A.: I’m not neurotic about it and made a decision early on not to let it rule me, but a singer must be smart and take care of oneself! You can’t do what normal people do because the instrument is inside the body, so it becomes a way of life to protect yourself.
Q.: Do you follow any rituals before the performance?
A.: Not a one. I’m not superstitious at all!
Question:You are celebrating your 25th anniversary on stage this year. In what way have things changed in the opera world since the beginning of your career?
Answer:Its been changing gradually and when that happens one doesn’t notice as much. One thing that has been noticeable however is that while the music itself used to be the most important it is now how young and good looking you are that seems to be of utmost importance. This has happened because agents have decided to put young singers in the position of “Stars” even before they’ve had a chance to prove themselves or pay their “dues”. This isn’t fair to those young people because you can’t just skip the steps it takes to learn your craft, get experience and feel more and more comfortable in your skin onstage. Making money on these singers is the goal and not helping to create a real artist. This will ultimately be detrimental to all involved as the young singer may burn out emotionally, vocally or even come to believe all the hype and never even try to reach their potential and then the career is shortened. Everyone loses in the end.
Q.:In what way , according to you, is opera as an art form still relevant in the 21st century?
A.:Opera will always be relevant because there will always be those people who love it and want it. It speaks to the heart like nothing else can. True, the majority doesn’t understand or even want to, but for the ones who do, it’s eternal.
Q.:You are currently singing Alcina in Vivaldi’s Orlando Furioso in Paris and on tour in several European cities, a role you have sung many times in concert performances and on a memorable recording with J.-C. Spinosi. It occurred to me during the performance that Alcina who manipulates men and toys with them, like Circe who turns Ulysses’ companions into pigs, begins to lose her grip on things the moment she seriously falls in love, i.e. becomes “human”. How do you see the role of the sorceress in this piece?
A.: Alcina is on a journey that ultimately and surprisingly destroys her. She begins the opera seeing Love as a game. But when she falls in love for real, then she becomes its unrequited victim. She isn’t immune to the power of love or human emotion like she thought she was. It really surprises her in the end and she can’t accept her human like failings.
Q.:You have travelled a long way from the Rosinas and Angelinas of your earlier days to “grown up”-roles like Fricka in “Das Rheingold”, Countess Geschwitz in “Lulu” and upcoming Kostelnicka in “Jenufa” as well as Lady Macbeth! How do you make the transition?
A.:I sing whatever I sing with the voice that I have. There has been a vocal evolution through the years to be sure. My voice has taken on different colors and depths as well as personality, and if it isn’t exactly what it was as a young singer, that’s OK. It’s different and in some ways even better! The roles I have chosen to do through the years exemplify my voice as it is at that given moment. These roles also allow me to enjoy a depth of dramatic feeling and acting that maybe I just wasn’t capable of when I was younger. The transition itself has been rather effortless because I don’t pretend to sing any of these new roles as someone else might sing them but only as I am capable of singing them.
Q.:In recent years you seem to have become a favourite of German director Christof Loy’s. How did this “special relationship” come about and how would you describe working with him?
A.:I first met Christof Loy at my Paris apartment to talk over the role of “Geschwitz” in Berg’s LULU for his new production at Covent Garden. I immediately fell in love with his way of thinking, his joy for the project and ultimately his way of working. The feeling was mutual and after a wonderful MERRY WIDOW in Geneva, we are doing “Macbeth” together at Geneva again and Jenufa at the Deutsche Oper Berlin.
Q.:You teach masterclasses. How do you see your role, your responsibilty as teacher? In what way do you think young singers can learn from your experience, your career?
A.:Master classes are a passion of mine because I can see such an instant improvement in the well being and therefore the voice of the singer in just that 30 minute session! I don’t presume to teach technically in that amount of time, but I do believe its possible to zero in on the most important thing that could help that specific singer psychologically to open up their body and voice; I seem to be rather good at it so it’s encouraging for the future! I have 25 years of experience to give weight behind the things I say and I feel it’s a real duty to tell others what I’ve been through. That’s why the Q & A sessions at the end are so important.
Q.:Now for some more unpleasant aspects of the opera world; keywords: favouritism, sexism, ageism … Your experiences with any of these.
A.:Of course there is always a bit of all of this happening in the entertainment world, but to tell you he honest truth, I haven’t had terrible experiences that I can remember. The voice is a special animal! People do have their favorites and its not all just about the sound. It has to do with the total package and so I completely understand if I’m passed over for another Mezzo because I just wasn’t what they were looking for! It’s normal. There also comes a time in everyone’s career where you aren’t the new young thing anymore and there’s a new “flavor of the month”. If you’ve sung for 25 years, no matter how good you are, you are “old news” and you shouldn’t even try to compete with the “New”. Let them have their time and enjoy the time you’re in now!
Q.:What do you love most about your life and career right now?
A.:The changes and excitement that come with learning new, dramatic roles into which I can “sink my teeth”! The chance to work with interesting, insightful people, the fact of living in Europe. My family and friends and loved ones make it all worth it!
Q.:How do you deal with the moments when there is just “too much music to learn?”
A.:I get crazy and then just DO it! The only way to make yourself feel better is to do the work.
Q.:You have recently taken up residence in Paris. Do you have a special affinity to this city, to France?
A.:I began my career in France and it was the first country to open wide its arms and welcome me in as a young, unknown singer. I have always loved France and still do!
Q.:Are singers constantly concerned about their voice? Scarves wrapped around the throat, hats, cough drops?
A.: I’m not neurotic about it and made a decision early on not to let it rule me, but a singer must be smart and take care of oneself! You can’t do what normal people do because the instrument is inside the body, so it becomes a way of life to protect yourself.
Q.: Do you follow any rituals before the performance?
A.: Not a one. I’m not superstitious at all!
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Les Liaisons Dangereuses or Alcina's Enchanted Island
Ludovico Ariosto’s epic poem "Orlando Furioso" is one of world literature’s most influential works, having inspired artists and writers through the centuries down to 20th century comics, sci-fi movies and post-modern pulp fiction. The fantastic plot with ogres, dragons, sea monsters, valiant knights, damsels in distress, a flying island and a trip to the moon proved a goldmine for opera composers, too. Handel alone based three of his operas on it. Vivaldi was up til recently known as a composer of, as Stravinsky maliciously put it, 300 times the same concerto...But it was only a question of time until the operas of this prolific musician would be excavated from the archives where they had gathered dust for 3 centuries. Jean-Christophe Spinosi is one of the protagonists of the Vivaldi revival, and ever since he recorded “Orlando Furioso” to worldwide critical acclaim there had been talk of staging it. The Théâtre des Champs-Elysées in Paris assembled the protagonists of this memorable recording this past march in a very elegant if sombre production by Pierre Audi. The Baroque theatre loved to put on lavish spectacles with a lot of machinery. Nowadays mechanical tricks have given way to psychological insight. So the setting was not an enchanted island but rather the somewhat morbid atmosphere of an austere Venetian palace where the wandering lovers are kept in a kind of claustrophobic “huis clos” under the control of Alcina. The magician of undetermined age – she could be several centuries old like Emilia Marty in “The Makropoulos Case” – is entangled in several dangerous liaisons with men whom she keeps in thrall with magic potions and manipulates according to her own wiles. The dramaturgy of the opera creaks a bit in the hinges like rusty stage machinery, as Vivaldi unlike Handel who wisely split up the convoluted plot into two operas (“Orlando” & “Alcina”) mixes the Alcina & Ruggiero story with the errant Orlando’s quest for his lost love Angelica who in turn is in pursuit of her own lover Medoro… Whenever things come to a seemingly unsolvable head enter Orlando raving and ranting. Marie-Nicole Lemieux in the title-role stormed and raged frighteningly, with never a note of the fierce coloratura awry! - upsetting the carefully arranged furniture in Alcina’s palazzo for which misdemeanour the lady of the house locked him up in a dark room! This nuisance removed for the time being Alcina can turn her full attention to her newest acquisition, the charming young knight Ruggiero, betrothed to Bradamante (who follows him disguised in men’s clothing) whom he callously forgets as soon as he sets eyes on the enchantress. Philippe Jaroussky as Ruggiero was the ideal personification of (male) innocence in danger, singing his transcendentally beautiful aria “Sol da te, mio dolce amore” with angelic voice, enchanting the enchantress and the audience alike. Alcina turns from temptress into helpless victim of an overpowering passion, and from this moment , when she shows real emotion, she starts losing control and her magic edifice begins to show cracks. Jennifer Larmore gave a first class impersonation of the sorceress, running the gamut from triumphant ruler over her magic empire with her fierce entrance aria “Alza in quegl’occhi”, via woman in love, “Amorose da rai del sole”, to growing fear and despair over losing her love and power at the same time in a poignant rendering of “Così potessi anch’io”. In the third act when all the characters are locked up in a kind of Hogarthian Bedlam she regaled us with a madscene that was worthy of Phèdre, simmering with quiet rage and despair, a real Racinian tragédienne! It was only consistent with a rather pessimistic reading of this piece that the director here changed the conventional happy ending of opera seria and has Alcina swallow poison. Orlando, in a strait jacket, remains locked in his own madness, and the others are left “smothered in surmise”, the knowledge dawning on them that nothing can be as it was before they got into this haunted palace; there is no returning to square one…With such a formidable performance in the central (if not the title) role it was difficult for the remaining singers to make much of an impact. This is again partly the fault of the composer/librettist who gave the roles of the comprimarii hardly any scope to develop full-bodied characterizations. Veronica Cangemi was a clear-voiced, touching Angelica; Romina Basso embodied her lover Medoro, sweet of voice and demeanour, and Kristina Hammarström an energetic and muscular Bradamante, Ruggiero’s betrothed,( who incidentally appeared more masculine than her rather girlish beloved). Christian Senn stood out as the only “proper” male voice in the whole ensemble, with a warm baritone ,making the best of the rather ungrateful role of Astolfo, Alcina’s discarded lover and helpmate in her intrigues.
Ensemble Matheus’ performance in the pit was dynamic and animated, you sensed the musicians’ familiarity with the score as they breathed fresh life into every note. “Historically informed performance” has come a long way since the first tentative experiments in the 1960s and 70s by the “pioneers”. Nowadays you have period bands that can produce as plush a sound as any traditional orchestra without losing any of the precision and transparency needed for baroque music. Spinosi's interpretation has lost some of its rough edges over the years, but none of its vigour and freshness.
So four hours (including two intervals) went by like nothing, and I shall never understand why people always mutter about the l e n g t h of Baroque operas but sit through 5, 6 hours of Wagner uncomplainingly!
Sunday, January 9, 2011
Lady Valencienne's Fan
Not really caring for schmaltzy Viennese operetta I had originally had no intention of going to Geneva for Die Lustige Witwe/ The Merry Widow/La Veuve Joyeuse, especially as JL was not even singing the lead. But a short while ago I received a calling from above a faithful poodle could not ignore, so booked a ticket in the cheapest category, a flight (not so cheap on short notice) and a hotel room (probably cheap by Swiss standards) and set out in anticipation of a nice New Year’s Eve entertainment. I dimly remembered having been there before, 15 years ago, “L’Italiana in Algeri” at the Grand Théâtre, a party at a lakeside villa and a pair of black trousers being lost in transit (a subject of chaff among my friends ever since…this time I “played safe” and wore a skirt…)
The Merry Widow I had so far known only in the shape of the old Lubitsch movie starring Jeannette MacDonald and Maurice Chevalier. Of the Loy production it can be said that it was sober and decidedly un- schmaltzy – for which I was grateful. The setting was (apparently) a hotel-lobby, thirties-style, modelled on the entrance hall of the Palais des Nations. My fellow-Berliner Annette Dasch was in keeping with this anti-glamour interpretation in being a rather square and homespun Hanna Glawari. But who says that this role must be played like a “diva”?! The Vilja-Lied was rendered simply and touchingly, avoiding the pitfalls of kitsch of this “Wunschkonzert” number . Why the poor woman had to sing this clad only in bra and slip however was a twist of the Regisseur I could not quite follow. I shivered in her place although it was pretty warm in my seat in the gods. Johannes Martin Kraenzle was a dashing Danilo, his warm baritone belying his assumed rakish attitude. I was touched to see the great José van Dam again in the role of Baron Zeta after so many years whom I had admired in many performances at the Deutsche Oper in the 1970s.
Glitz and glam which this piece can after all not do without was added by JL in the role of Valencienne, wife to Baron Zeta, in this Genevan (i.e. cosmopolitan) version “an American from NYC with artistic ambition”. She got the most gorgeous dresses (and dessous!) and her rendition of Foolish Heart from Weill’s One Touch of Venus was a real show-stopper. Her admirer Camille de Rossillon was the young Swiss tenor Bernard Richter, fresh of looks and voice, whom she follows into the chambre séparée (all the while protesting that she is “a respectable wife!”, but only a woman of super-human virtue would resist such an ardently sung invitation!), and the almost Puccini-esque duet “Komm in den kleinen Pavillon” was another highlight of the evening. The whole intrigue here revolves around a lost fan, but whereas a lost handkerchief in “Othello” triggers a tragedy, a fan can pass through many hands and return to its owner without any harm being done. Still one should not trifle with these seemingly insignificant utensils. A fan might get lost irretrievably (like a pair of trousers) with dire consequences. But I digress…After all an operetta must have a happy ending: Valencienne remains an exemplar wife –transgressing only in doing a cancan in dessous –, Hanna gets her Danilo, safely depositing her millions in a Swiss bank, and they all live happily ever after to the tune of “Lippen schweigen, ‘s flüstern Geigen…”
I saw older members of the audience swaying (“schunkeln”) to the popular tunes remembered from their youth (and probably humming along inwardly). One elderly lady said starry-eyed (in German): “Das war ja ein richtiges Wunschkonzert!”
And, yes, I, too, got my money’s worth – although you are really being ripped off in that country: 16 chf for the programme, 2 chf for the coatcheck – and you could also book a posh New Year’s Eve dinner at 185 chf p.p. “Caviar to the general!” I say with Hamlet. Give me a decent Swiss fondue and I am with you! So the faithful poodle returned to the hotel without having got so much as a dog biscuit or a bone to gnaw upon and went to bed hungry. I think I now know why I’ve always preferred cats – they are independent, individualistic, wayward, unpredictable - and they never obey orders!
The Merry Widow I had so far known only in the shape of the old Lubitsch movie starring Jeannette MacDonald and Maurice Chevalier. Of the Loy production it can be said that it was sober and decidedly un- schmaltzy – for which I was grateful. The setting was (apparently) a hotel-lobby, thirties-style, modelled on the entrance hall of the Palais des Nations. My fellow-Berliner Annette Dasch was in keeping with this anti-glamour interpretation in being a rather square and homespun Hanna Glawari. But who says that this role must be played like a “diva”?! The Vilja-Lied was rendered simply and touchingly, avoiding the pitfalls of kitsch of this “Wunschkonzert” number . Why the poor woman had to sing this clad only in bra and slip however was a twist of the Regisseur I could not quite follow. I shivered in her place although it was pretty warm in my seat in the gods. Johannes Martin Kraenzle was a dashing Danilo, his warm baritone belying his assumed rakish attitude. I was touched to see the great José van Dam again in the role of Baron Zeta after so many years whom I had admired in many performances at the Deutsche Oper in the 1970s.
Glitz and glam which this piece can after all not do without was added by JL in the role of Valencienne, wife to Baron Zeta, in this Genevan (i.e. cosmopolitan) version “an American from NYC with artistic ambition”. She got the most gorgeous dresses (and dessous!) and her rendition of Foolish Heart from Weill’s One Touch of Venus was a real show-stopper. Her admirer Camille de Rossillon was the young Swiss tenor Bernard Richter, fresh of looks and voice, whom she follows into the chambre séparée (all the while protesting that she is “a respectable wife!”, but only a woman of super-human virtue would resist such an ardently sung invitation!), and the almost Puccini-esque duet “Komm in den kleinen Pavillon” was another highlight of the evening. The whole intrigue here revolves around a lost fan, but whereas a lost handkerchief in “Othello” triggers a tragedy, a fan can pass through many hands and return to its owner without any harm being done. Still one should not trifle with these seemingly insignificant utensils. A fan might get lost irretrievably (like a pair of trousers) with dire consequences. But I digress…After all an operetta must have a happy ending: Valencienne remains an exemplar wife –transgressing only in doing a cancan in dessous –, Hanna gets her Danilo, safely depositing her millions in a Swiss bank, and they all live happily ever after to the tune of “Lippen schweigen, ‘s flüstern Geigen…”
I saw older members of the audience swaying (“schunkeln”) to the popular tunes remembered from their youth (and probably humming along inwardly). One elderly lady said starry-eyed (in German): “Das war ja ein richtiges Wunschkonzert!”
And, yes, I, too, got my money’s worth – although you are really being ripped off in that country: 16 chf for the programme, 2 chf for the coatcheck – and you could also book a posh New Year’s Eve dinner at 185 chf p.p. “Caviar to the general!” I say with Hamlet. Give me a decent Swiss fondue and I am with you! So the faithful poodle returned to the hotel without having got so much as a dog biscuit or a bone to gnaw upon and went to bed hungry. I think I now know why I’ve always preferred cats – they are independent, individualistic, wayward, unpredictable - and they never obey orders!
Thursday, November 11, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)